Throughout
history, humans have sought to produce the highest efficiency, generating the
largest amount of energy with the least amount of human effort. As humans
progressed, their sources of energy evolved, from wood to whales to fossil
fuels to renewable fuels. This is interesting because human population growth has gone from steady growth for thousands of years to exponential growth after the industrial revolution.
Pre-industrial
societies depended primarily on muscle power and biomass for their energy
needs. Biomass consisted primarily of wood. In most areas, wood is the most
easily accessible form of fuel, as little industrial or specialized tools are
required. Since the Holocene Epoch, humans used wood as fuel source for
heating. Furthermore, the humans’ mastery of fire equipped humans with powerful
tool unavailable to other species. As a result, humans used fire to ward off
dangerous animals while hunting protein-rich food. In the human history,
deforestation has a long history. From 3000 BCE, the forests of ancient Near
East were cut for the construction of temples and palaces in the kingdoms and
empires in the Fertile Crescent. By 2000 BCE, the forests of the Middle East
were largely depleted, thus shifting trade and power in the Mediterranean region
to Crete and the Greek world because of their timber abundance. At this time,
the wood was used for fuel in copper furnaces for producing bronze, the primary
export of Crete. After 600 years, the Greeks exhausted the timber on Crete, so
trading power shifting to Greece, Macedonia, and Asia. By the 13th century, Europe exploited
wood for construction of large ships, as trade and commerce expanded mostly by
sea. As a result, it was important for European powers to make seaworthy
vessels to continue their growth. Towards the end of the 15th
century, there were signs of timber shortage, as Venice began important
complete ship hulls from Northern Europe. The exploitation of wood continued
for hundreds of years, until the discovery of better fuels.
The
inventions and discoveries of the Industrial Revolution propelled the quest for
more powerful energy sources. As more sophisticated mechanical inventions were
invented, the need for inexhaustible sources of energy became necessary for
industrial uses and transportation.
In
the United States during the 19th century, nearly 2 billion hectares
of forest land was cut. The young nation was built on this wood, as cities,
railroads, newspapers, insulation, and power were constructed. In addition,
large shipping vessels were also constructed, many involved in the whaling
industry. In 1851, the United States whaling industry employed over 15,000 sea
men and 35,000 on shore to support the endeavor. A single sperm whale could
yield 1,900 gallons of oil, equivalent to 63 barrels. Sperm whale were
exploited for their oil, which was used for machinery lubrication, Ambergris
for perfume, and baleen for umbrellas and bustles. Out of the 700 whaling ships
worldwide, over 500 sailed from New England; specifically 429 were registered
in New Bedford, one of the richest cities in the world during the time.
However, after the peak of the industry in 1851, the whaling industry began
declining. First, the US Civil War in 1860 resulted in the US navy
commandeering and sinking 40 whaling ships in the blockade of the Confederate
Savannah and Charleston harbors. By 1865, only 50% of the fleet remained. In
1871, much of the Artic whaling fleet was crushed in the ice due to hunters
traveling far north due to the scarcity of whales. As a result, the year was of
financial ruin. By 1875, the United States whaling industry was gone due to
diminishing whale population and economics of the industry. In 1971, the United
States suspended all commercial whaling.
During
the same time as the decline of the whaling industry, the industrial revolution
brought other energy sources to the consumer.
In 1859, petroleum was drilled, which was a plentiful energy source that
began to replace coal. Oil was distilled into kerosene and used as a lamp oil.
As a result, kerosene replaced the dwindling supplies of whale oil used for lamps.
Oil became a more desirable fuel source than coal for various reasons. First,
coal was an unreliable fuel source due to the labor issues surrounding the
mining of coal. Miners lobbied for safer working environments and better wages,
which affected the amount of coal available to the consumer. Second, oil
emitted less particulate pollution than coal. Finally, it was easier energy
source to obtain and transport. Furthermore, in 1861, oil was the liquid fuel
for the internal combustion, one of the most influential inventions of the Industrial
Revolution, as it allowed moving large metal vehicles over large distances. The
fuel of the internal combustion engine was easier to use than shoveling coal
into a furnace to power a locomotive.
In
the 1920s, American companies pumped accessible oil. However, even as prices
dropped, the oil industry suffered because demand could not keep up with
supply, causing frequent boom-bust cycles. Oil became an important asset for
World War II. With South East Asian oil in contention, the oil shortages were
factor in Japan’s attack on the United States at Pearl Harbor. By 1970, the
United States oil production peaked, with over 9 million barrels of oil
produced every day. In 1971, the United States suspended all commercial whaling.
Today,
oil is equated to money and power. There are massive investments in the history
of oil production worldwide. As a result, there are wide array of political
impacts from this fuel. Oil is necessary for every nation, while production is
dominated only by handful of countries. In addition, there are large climate
and ecological changes occurring as a consequence of exploiting these fossil
fuels. Finally, the cost of oil has been steadily increasing over the last few
decades, due to increased demand from countries such as India, China, and
Brazil. As a result, within the last 30 years, there’s been greater demand for
renewable sources of energy, through solar, wind, nuclear, geothermal power.
These renewable sources of energy have potential to shift the economies of the
world to a much cleaner fuel source. However, even to this day, oil remains the
primary fuel source of the world.
Literature Cited
·
Smil, Vaclav. Energies: An Illustrated Guide to the
Biosphere and Civilization. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.
Nye, David E. Consuming Power: A Social History
of American Energies. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999.
·
The Deforestation of Mount Lebanon Author(s):
Marvin W. Mikesell Source: Geographical Review, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Jan., 1969),
pp. 1-28
·
Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B. 1998. Land-use
history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: Regional forest dynamics in
central New England. Ecosystems 1: 96-119.
·
K.J.W. Oosthoek. Undated. The Role of Wood in
World History http://www.eh-resources.org/wood.html
·
Aguilar, A. 1986. A Review of Old Basque Whaling
and its Effect on the Right Whales (Eubalaena glacialis) of the North Atlantic.
Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. (special issue) 10: 191-199.
·
Vickers, D. 1983. The First Whalemen of
Nantucket. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Oct.,
1983), pp. 560-583.
·
Baker, S and Clapham, P. J. 2004. Modelling the
past and future of whales and whaling. TREE 19: 365-371.Smith, T. D et al.
2012. Spatial and Seasonal Distribution of American
· Whaling and Whales in the Age of Sail. PLoS1. April 2012. Issue 4.
I really enjoyed your whole blog! The posts were so captivating with astounding facts and figures to showcase the information. Separating the blog posts is a great way of building interest and suspense as we wait for the next one! You’ll gain followers for sure. Integrating the facts into your activity truly illustrated how fast our population is growing. I can’t imagine the number of babies being born as I’m writing this! This article on human energy sources particularly caught my eye. As you were evaluating the transition of these sources of fuel, I could see how human technology has changed to obtain wood, whales, and fossil fuels.
ReplyDeleteThe only critique I have is to double check formatting and layout. Photos and diagrams would really illustrate your points and it’s better if we’re not distracted by font changes as we read the content. There were also moments that felt as though facts were simply being listed so introducing sentence variety would really keep us engaged in this deep and interesting history. Overall, this is a great start with huge potential!
Fixed the formatting and layout problems. Still working on getting all of the photos/diagrams to show up. Thanks for the review!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this blog and the way you led up to each section with things to think about. The population clock link you posted is really cool and entertaining, but I wonder how precise the figures are and how the data s collected. Another aspect about this website that I enjoyed is that it shows how much faster the world population is increasing with respect to the United States’ population. I also like the sections you wrote which explain extensification and intensification of food production as it further clarified these terms for me. I think it would be interesting to add what types of agriculture are more or less harmful to the environment (EG impacts of growing vegetables vs impacts of growing fruits).
ReplyDeleteI was very glad to read the section about genetically modified crops. I think that the majority of the population views GM crops negatively because they do not understand what it means to be “genetically modified.” I think your section highlighted the positives of altering plants to benefit humans. Some graphs or tables comparing GM crops to non-GM crops would be a good addition to your blog. Your writing style is very easy to read and personable, yet your blog is full of information.
Overall this is a very informative blog. You have covered so many great topics and explained every one of them very well. It is especially great that you were so interested with the information we learned in class and wanted to learn more about it. I think if you put more images to the second half of your blog it could have made it better. Another big problem I see is that you do not have in-text citation. My professors have always told me always cite, cite, cite because if you do not do so people may think you came up with the information all by yourself. Now I will comment each section.
ReplyDeleteThe Pre-industrial Revolution and Industrial Revolution sections provide very through explanations of all of how early Holocene humans switched from hunter-gatherers to farmers due to the warming of the climate. You have done a great job summarizing so much information in only a few paragraphs. Although we have learned about the Neolithic Demographic Transition graph in class, you have made a very concise and clear explanation. Bravo! Later you provide an explanation the Modern Demographic Transition and how African countries have stagnant population growth. I remember your great lecture on Malthus; your explanation of his Principle of Population is superb. Although Malthus has predicted that famine and disease act as checks for a population, he did not see the technological advancements we have today that has allowed human population to explode.
I really like your Human Population Today section because it provides everything into perspective. It’s kind of funny to note here that China and India’s populations combined are almost more than the other top eight countries combined. I believe that as people’s lives get better and more people are allowed to get an education, the population in these top two countries will begin to decrease and reach an equilibrium that does not put a stress on the world’s food production. It’s excellent that you point that every person is born every 14 seconds and it would be interesting to find out what the birth-death rate is.
Your next few sections on Agriculture are superb. It’s excellent that you first distinguish the differences between conventional agriculture and alternative agriculture. I think if you put a picture here it could add a bigger effect to distinguish the two. I am more of a conventional agriculturist because I believe the negative effects of pesticides and inorganic fertilizer on the Earth’s ecosystem are too large. However, in poor countries where people do not have enough food, I think it will be important to use some of these alternative agriculture methods to stabilize their economy, and once they become stable conventional agriculture should always be used. The section on Genetic Modified crops is fascinating because I have always wondered how grocery stores manage to buy crops that all look the same. Although GM crops can increase the yield, will they have any negative effects on human health? I really like the part where you point out that Golden Rice and GM soybeans can cause diseases because I think not many people know about that. The rest of the sections are all concise and good. One thing I would recommend is reorganizing the sections because now they are kind of jumbled.